Melodies in Marketing

Authentic Green Marketing & Sustainable Product Development

The Tao of Style May 13, 2008

Filed under: Design, New Product Development — Mario Vellandi @ 2:48 am

tao yin yang style designEmbrace polarity & celebrate duality.

Style is one element of product design. Its stimulation of the senses - visual, auditory, taste, olfactory, tactile - often makes it the most prominent feature. Its importance, however, is relative.

In product design & communication, the metaphorical colors we choose and their luminosity determine the sensory positioning. The best palette is found by questioning what matters most to the specific target audience and what appropriately fits your brand. But does the product/service absolutely need to be strongly positioned in one direction or another?

The answer is No. Effective differentiation simply implies holding a unique position with the perceiver’s mind.

Style can be fluid and multi-faceted. When considering the emotions we want the product to evoke, one can look at a variety of themes, their opposites, and ways they can be combined together. Perhaps the product is destined to have a particular sensory experience, based on a defined company image and set of values. Perhaps fashion and trends drive the product line, or the industry product category. In either case, style serves a single purpose, but its strategy and execution is dynamic.

The goal in ideation is to quickly generate a variety of competitive product concepts aligned with your brand values, portfolio fit, and product innovation strategy. While these are the criteria we’ll use for screening concepts later, a strong cognizance of them during ideation can inhibit the process activity: Exploration.

Consider polarities and their potentially combined layering & blending. After some recent creative brainstorming, here are some contrasting styles, emotions, and patterns that I’ve put together.

Antique, Historic

Modern, Contemporary

Humility; Courage; Happy; Joyous

Pride; Fear; Angry; Sad

Dark; Opaque; Rough; Sharp

Light; Translucent; Smooth; Rounded

Fast; Continuous

Slow; Intermittent

Accumulation; Indulgent; Embellished

Reduction; Modest; Simplistic

Strong; Hard; Heavy; Dense; Loud

Weak; Soft; Light; Loose; Faint

Spicy; Hot; Bitter

Bland; Mild; Sweet

Conservative; Conformed; Commodity

Liberal, Customized; Unique

Industrious, Productive

Relaxed, Lazy

Individualist

Collectivist

Technical; Scientific; Objective

Artistic; Experiential; Subjective

Deep; Low; Near

Shallow; High; Far

. . .

What additional methods of comparing & contrasting do you use?

 

Leave a Reply